Skip to main content
Back to State Guides
State CPOM reference

Arizona: CPOM Ownership & Oversight Reference

State reference
Arizona

Arizona: Ownership and Oversight

No general CPOM; NP independence since 2001; two-track PA model (2024). Arizona is one of the loosest states in the country on both axes: no generally enforced corporate practice doctrine, full NP independence for a quarter century, and a 2024 PA law that lets experienced PAs practice without any physician agreement at all.

Who the statute actually covers

  • CPOM posture: Arizona has no generally enforced corporate practice of medicine doctrine; physicians may be employed by ordinary business entities, and professional corporations (A.R.S. Title 10, Ch. 20) are available but not mandatory. Constraints come from licensing law, fee-splitting, and payer rules rather than entity law.
  • "Supervision agreement" (A.R.S. § 32-2531): the written agreement required for PAs with fewer than 8,000 AZPA-certified clinical hours, signed with a supervising physician OR with an employer (physician group, physician practice, or licensed health care institution with at least one Arizona physician providing oversight).
  • Collaborative-practice certification (A.R.S. §§ 32-2531(B), 32-2536; HB 2043, effective Jan. 1, 2024): Board certification of at least 8,000 clinical practice hours, after which no supervision agreement is required; the PA must collaborate with, consult with, or refer to "the appropriate health care professional" (not necessarily a physician), at a level set by the practice setting's policies; electronic collaboration suffices.

1. Who can own what

Entity / PathWho may ownKey limits
Practice entitiesPhysicians and other licensees may practice through ordinary corporations and LLCs; lay ownership and physician employment by lay entities are not categorically prohibited.Arizona deals are policed by licensing boards and payer rules, not ownership percentages.
NP-owned practiceFully viable; Arizona NPs have had full practice authority since 2001 and own practices without any physician relationship.AZBN is the sole regulator; employer-imposed collaboration is policy, not law.
PA-owned practiceNo prohibition in entity law; an 8,000-hour collaborative-certified PA can operate without a supervision agreement, making PA-led AZ models unusually feasible.Sub-8,000-hour PAs in the entity still need supervision agreements.
Lay / MSOPermitted to a degree unusual among states; MSO structures are common and low-friction.Do not export Arizona assumptions to CPOM states.

2. Collaborative and supervisory oversight

RoleAgreement requiredOversight mechanicsPath to independence
PAUnder 8,000 AZPA-certified hours: written supervision agreement with a supervising physician or qualifying employer (§ 32-2531); practice prohibited until signed. 8,000+ certified hours with Board collaborative certification: no agreement; collaboration/consultation/referral per practice-setting policy.No numeric ratio. The 2023 law removed the supervising physician's blanket responsibility for delegated tasks and the weekly-meeting requirement for off-site practice; scope now runs to any medical service the PA is competent to perform, including prescribing prescription-only medications for up to one year per patient.Yes: 8,000 certified hours plus Board certification ends the supervision agreement permanently.
NPNone. Arizona NPs have full practice authority (since 2001): independent assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and prescribing including controlled substances with DEA registration, under AZBN alone.No agreements, ratios, chart reviews, or transition periods at any career stage.Independent from licensure.

3. Primary authorities

  • A.R.S. § 32-2531; § 32-2536; HB 2043 (2023).
  • A.R.S. § 32-1601 et seq. (Nurse Practice Act).
  • A.R.S. Title 10, Ch. 20 (professional corporations, optional).

Practical read: Arizona is the control case for the rest of the country: almost none of the usual CPOM machinery exists, and the compliance work shifts to payer enrollment, fee-splitting, and clinical scope. The one operational trap is the PA two-track system: an entity staffed with a mix of certified and uncertified PAs is running two different legal regimes in one building, and sub-8,000-hour PAs cannot see a single patient until their supervision agreements are signed.

General education, not legal advice.